you're reading...
Gas, Shale Gas

British Geological Survey’s shale gas groundwater study to omit Cuadrilla’s fracking sites

Potential scenarios of methane pollution from shale. Source: Nature, September 2011.

The British Geological Survey’s (BGS) study to establish levels of methane in groundwater in the UK will not include sites ‘fracked’ by Cuadrilla Resources in Lancashire.

These sites operated by Cuadrilla, which last year claimed that a 500 square mile area around Blackpool, Preston and Southport contains enough methane to meet national gas demand for at least 50 years, are the only current fracking sites in the UK. The firm halted drilling last May, however, after the BGS concluded fracking at Cuadrilla’s Preese Hall 1 shale gas well had likely caused two small earthquakes off the Fylde coast.

According to the BGS, evidence from the USA has shown very high methane concentrations in groundwater in areas of shale gas exploitation, which has been directly related to shale gas operations. Yet there is considerable uncertainty as to the source of methane and there is no baseline data on methane concentrations in groundwater before the onset of shale gas exploitation.

Last December the BGS commenced a year-long project to establish the baseline of methane levels in groundwater in seven areas: Northern Ireland; South Wales; the East Pennines (Cleveland Basin); the Wessex and Weald Basin in Southern England; the East Midlands, the Northumberland Trough; and Lancashire.

Cuadrilla Resources’ capped gas well in Cowden, Kent

However, according to Dr. Rob Ward, head of groundwater science at the BGS, the study will not include Cuadrilla’s existing sites despite its use of fracking to determine its estimate of 200 trillion cubic feet for gas in place in the Bowland Shale.

“We are not testing those specific areas,” he told Millicent Media. “At the moment [Cuadrilla] is not exploiting shale gas, it has only drilled exploratory wells. This is a strategic survey to build up a national baseline against which environmental impacts can be assessed and appropriate management decisions taken if large-scale exploitation goes ahead.”

At each region, the BGS will identify 20-25 monitoring sites, such as boreholes, to take samples of groundwater. Once sampled, the BGS will test for concentrations of dissolved methane.

Dr. Rob Ward, head of groundwater science at the British Geological Survey. Source: BGS

If the BGS finds elevated levels, says Dr. Ward, it will conduct a more rigorous (isotopic) analysis to determine whether the methane is biogenic, which is usually produced from organic material in peatbogs, landfill etc., or thermogenic methane, which is produced from material buried at depth like shale.

“At the 2-4 km depths I anticipate shale gas will be explored and potentially exploited in the UK the methane will be of thermogenic origin, so it would have an isotopic signature which would enable us to disassociate it from, for example, landfill gas.”

Dr. Ward said the BGS started the study in South Wales in December.  Due to scarce resources, he says, the study is “limited” and has no official budget, with funds being reallocated from other projects. Just “five or six” people are working on the study, Dr. Ward added.

The study is, however, self-funded and independent. Dr. Ward expects sampling to be completed by the end of 2012, with a report due to be published in 2013.

 

About these ads

About timprobert

Journalist & Owner, Millicent Media

Discussion

4 thoughts on “British Geological Survey’s shale gas groundwater study to omit Cuadrilla’s fracking sites

  1. Is it yet possible to have water tested from your private bore hole for methane levels?

    If they do become contaminated are those happy MPs going to provide compensation?

    Posted by adrian darke | 01/01/2013, 9:06 PM

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Pingback: Sussex MP: ‘don’t worry: be happy’ about fracking | gasdrillinginbalcombe - 09/03/2012

  2. Pingback: Fracking | Changing more than lightbulbs - 05/06/2013

  3. Pingback: Gás de xisto [fracking] dos EUA: só conversa fiada | Blog do Liberato - 10/07/2014

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

@TimProbert

  • "Hello. We're from Paterson SmallNukeCHP. Can we dig up your road to install some pipes to bring heat from our nuclear plant?" Hello? HELLO? 9 hours ago
  • The idea that the UK would build hundreds of small nuclear CHP plants plus the accompanying piping infrastructure is utterly risible 9 hours ago
  • Dear old Christopher must have forgotten Denmark's state utility Dong (snigger) owns much of the CHP plant and that the UK has privatised 9 hours ago
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,571 other followers

%d bloggers like this: