you're reading...
CCS, Coal, Gas, Policy & Regulation

Vattenfall abandons 500 MW Jaenschwalde carbon capture plant in Germany

Vattenfall was to retrofit a 250 MW coal unit with post-combustion CCS and build a new 250 MW Oxyfuel unit at a cost of €1.5 billion. Courtesy Vattenfall

Swedish power utility Vattenfall has abandoned a planned 500 MW carbon capture and storage (CCS) plant at Jaenschwalde, Germany, expected to cost €1.5 billion, after the German federal government rejected a bill allowing underground carbon storage.

The 500 MW CCS demonstration project was to utilize a new 250 MW Oxyfuel boiler and see another 250 MW boiler retrofitted with a post-combustion capture unit. The EU-supported project would have been operational by 2015/16.

In July, Germany’s lower house approved a bill allowing the underground storage of carbon dioxide but it was rejected by the upper house on September 23. Following the rejection of the bill by the Bundesrat, a mediation committee was formed, which adjourned twice in November without result.

In a statement, Tuomo Hatakka, Vattenfall´s country manager for Germany, said: “We must unfortunately accept that there is currently insufficient will in German federal politics to implement the European directive so that a CCS demonstration project in Germany could be possible.”

Hatakka said that a clear legal framework was needed and the existing draft for the CCS law is, without substantial improvement, insufficient for multi-billion investments in further development of carbon capture technology.

The Swedish state-owned utility said it would continue to further development of CCS. Vattenfall is a main partner in UK’s largest CCS pilot plant at Ferrybridge Power Station in West Yorkshire, which opened 30 November.

The company said it will also continue the test operation of the CCS pilot plant at Schwarze Pumpe, Germany, and work for the development of a European storage infrastructure.

About these ads

About timprobert

Journalist & Owner, Millicent Media

Discussion

No comments yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

@TimProbert

  • As it is, UK billpayers are going to subsidise what could have been built anyway on top of National Grid plugging short-term gaps with SBR 10 hours ago
  • ...and others are coming to end of life. Were it not for EMR, we might have had more new plant online by now or at least under construction 10 hours ago
  • If you look at the age of the offline plants they're all 30 years+ Ferrybridge was commissioned in 1966. Hartlepool & Heysham are lemons... 10 hours ago
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,369 other followers

%d bloggers like this: